You promised to put America at the forefront of everything you do, and you did it in different ways, from trade to national security, to protecting our borders, to the rights of Washington, D.C. And today, you put America first in terms of international agreements and the environment. Maintaining the agreement could also be serious obstacles for the United States when we begin to implement the restrictions on the abundant energy reserves of the United States, which we have very strongly initiated. It would have been unthinkable if an international agreement could have prevented the United States from conducting its own internal economic affairs, but that is the new reality we face if we do not leave the agreement or negotiate a much better deal. We have one of the most frequent energy reserves in the world, enough to lift America`s poorest working people out of poverty. But as part of this agreement, we are effectively locking up these reserves and taking the great wealth of our nation – it is a great wealth, it is a phenomenal wealth. Not so long ago, we had no idea that we had such wealth and that we were leaving millions and millions of families trapped in poverty and unemployment. The same nations that are asking us to maintain the agreement are the countries that have cost the United States billions of dollars through hard trade practices and, in many cases, lax contributions to our critical military alliance. You see what`s going on. It`s pretty obvious to those who want to keep an open mind. In the case of service contracts in the United States, the use of SOWs remains strong, although objective statements (SOOs) and performance statements (PWS) have become increasingly popular because of their focus on performance-based concepts, such as desired service results and performance standards.

SOWs are usually used when the task is known and can be described in some terms. They may be preferred if the government does not want innovative approaches or if differences in contractors are considered a risk. SOOs define high-level performance results and objectives, and PWS highlight desired results, results and objectives at a more detailed and measurable level, while SOW provides explicit instructions on the direction of work for the contractor or supplier. Thus, the United States will cease today all implementation of the non-binding Paris Agreement and the draconian financial and economic burdens that the agreement imposes on our country. It also means ending the implementation of the national contribution and, most importantly, the Green Climate Fund, which is costing the United States a huge fortune. If the obstructionists want to end up with me, let`s make them non-obstructionists. We`re all going to sit down together, and we`re going to get back to the deal. And we will do it well, and we will not close our factories, and we will not lose our jobs. And we will meet with the Democrats and all the people who represent either the Paris agreement or something we can do, much better than the Paris agreement.

And I think the people of our country will be delighted, and I think the people of the world will be delighted. But until we did, we came out of the agreement. While the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America, what it does, and the mines begin to open up. We have a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A grand opening of a brand new mine. It`s outrageous. This has not happened for many years. They asked me if I was going to leave. I will try. China will be allowed to build hundreds of other coal-fired power plants. Therefore, we cannot build the facilities, but they can, in accordance with this agreement.